{"id":52855,"date":"2026-05-13T14:57:27","date_gmt":"2026-05-13T13:57:27","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/maritimehub.co.uk\/?p=52855"},"modified":"2026-05-13T18:53:56","modified_gmt":"2026-05-13T17:53:56","slug":"middle-east-conflict-redraws-global-gas-trade-map","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/maritimehub.co.uk\/middle-east-conflict-redraws-global-gas-trade-map\/","title":{"rendered":"Middle East conflict redraws global gas trade map"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Middle East conflict redraws global gas trade map<\/p>\n<p>he fragile equilibrium of the global natural gas market \u2013 which had spent much of the early 2025\/2026 heating season trending toward stability \u2013 has been shattered by the geopolitical eruption in the Middle East.<\/p>\n<p>According to the International Energy Agency\u2019s (IEA) Gas Market Report, Q2-2026, a series of unprecedented disruptions\u2014top of which is the de facto closure of the Strait of Hormuz\u2014has altered the trajectory of international energy trade. What was once anticipated as a year of easing fundamentals and \u201cstrong LNG supply growth\u201d has instead devolved into a period of \u201cunprecedented uncertainty\u201d that threatens to delay the next global LNG wave by at least two years, the IEA said.<\/p>\n<p>Decreased volumes are just part of the picture; it\u2019s the total restructuring of supply routes and the re-emergence of extreme price volatility that brokers and charterers need to take note of.<\/p>\n<p>The report states that \u201cthe loss, for the time being, of almost 20% of global LNG supply has caused strong price volatility, driving up natural gas prices in both Asia and Europe to their highest levels since the 2022\/23 energy crisis\u201d. For trade partners and industrial consumers, the implications of this is that the era of predictable, softening prices seen in late 2025 has ended, replaced by a \u201cmajor supply shock to regional and global gas markets\u201d, according to the IEA.<\/p>\n<p>The Strait of Hormuz serves as the world\u2019s most critical artery for liquefied natural gas. In 2025, approximately 110 billion cubic meters (bcm) of LNG\u2014nearly 20% of global trade\u2014transited this waterway, according to IEA figures. However, the effective closure of the strait in March essentially \u201creduced the combined LNG production of Qatar and the United Arab Emirates by close to 10 bcm for the month\u201d. The IEA notes that while global deliveries initially fell by only 2% in March due to shipping lag times, the \u201cfull impact of the disruption\u201d began to manifest in April, with deliveries plunging 10% year-on-year in the first twenty days of that month.<\/p>\n<p>This paralysis has created a divergence in regional trade dynamics. While Europe\u2019s direct exposure to Hormuz is relatively limited\u2014less than 10% of the strait\u2019s LNG was destined for European shores in 2025\u2014Asian markets are \u201cdisproportionally shouldered\u201d by the impact, said the IEA. The report highlights that \u201calmost 90% of the volumes that exited the Persian Gulf via the Strait of Hormuz were destined for Asia, accounting for more than 25% of the region\u2019s total LNG imports\u201d.<\/p>\n<p>Markets such as Pakistan, Bangladesh, and India, which relied on these volumes for over half of their imports, have seen their trade flows \u201cslow to a trickle\u201d.<\/p>\n<p>Perhaps the most damaging outcome for long-term trade planning is the destruction of energy infrastructure in the region. The IEA warns that \u201cdamage from attacks on LNG liquefaction facilities in the Middle East is altering the medium-term outlook\u201d. Specifically, strikes on Qatari facilities could \u201creduce the country\u2019s LNG output by nearly 70 bcm by 2030, assuming a repair period of four years\u201d. When combined with delays to the North Field East expansion project, the conflict has already caused a \u201closs of around 120 bcm of cumulative LNG supply for the period 2026-2030\u201d.<\/p>\n<p>This leads to a depressed forecast for global trade balance: the expected \u201cLNG wave\u201d\u2014a period of projected oversupply that was supposed to keep prices low for the remainder of the decade\u2014is now expected to be delayed \u201cby at least two years\u201d. The IEA points out that \u201cthe losses resulting from the Middle East conflict account for around 15% of the expected global LNG supply over the 2026-2030 period\u201d. While new projects in North America and Africa, such as the Plaquemines LNG plant in Louisiana, are working to fill the gap, they are currently \u201coffsetting the declines\u201d rather than creating the surplus markets had anticipated.<\/p>\n<p>The current crisis has exposed the vulnerabilities of a global trade system reliant on a few narrow geographic chokepoints. The IEA emphasises that the energy crisis \u201chighlights the need to further strengthen the architecture of global gas supply security\u201d.<\/p>\n<p>From a trade perspective, this means a shift away from over-reliance on spot markets toward a \u201cdiversified portfolio of long-term contracts\u201d, which can \u201cmitigate short-term price variability both for buyers and sellers through sophisticated pricing formulae\u201d.<\/p>\n<p>Governments are already reacting to this new reality with emergency trade measures. The report notes that \u201cin early April, Australia and Singapore issued a Joint Statement on Economic Resilience and Essential Supplies to support the flow of essential goods including LNG\u201d. Simultaneously, the US Department of Energy authorised increased exports from the Plaquemines and Elba Island plants to both free trade and non-free trade agreement countries to \u201cboost LNG deliveries\u201d to allies.<\/p>\n<p>The \u201cmajor supply shock\u201d of the Middle East conflict has not only spiked prices but has effectively \u201cdistorted short-term gas market fundamentals\u201d for years to come, concludes the IEA. The focus must now remain on the \u201cduration of the effective closure of the Strait of Hormuz\u201d, as each passing month results in another 10 bcm of lost supply, further tightening the noose on global energy trade.<\/p>\n<p>hellenicshippingnews&#8230;<\/p>\n<div class=\"mh-source-attribution\">\n  <span>Source:<\/span><br \/>\n  <a href=\"https:\/\/www.hellenicshippingnews.com\/middle-east-conflict-redraws-global-gas-trade-map\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\">hellenicshipping<\/a>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Middle East conflict redraws global gas trade map<br \/>\nin<br \/>\nInternational Shipping News<br \/>\n05\/05\/2026<br \/>\nT<br \/>\nhe fragile equilibrium of the global natural gas market \u2013 which had spent much of the early 2025\/2026 heating season trending toward stability \u2013 has been shattered by the geopolitical eruption in the Middle East.<br \/>\nAccording to the International Energy Agency\u2019s (IEA) Gas Market Report, Q2-2026, a series of unprecedented disruptions\u2014top of which is the de facto closure of the Strait of Hormuz\u2014has altered the trajectory of international energy trade. What was once anticipated as a year of easing fundamentals and \u201cstrong LNG supply growth\u201d has instead devolved into a period of \u201cunprecedented uncertainty\u201d that threatens to delay the next global LNG wave by at least two years, the IEA said.<br \/>\nDecreased volumes are just part of the picture; it\u2019s the total restructuring of supply routes and the re-emergence of extreme price volatility that brokers and charterers need to take note of.<br \/>\nThe report states th<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":52856,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"fifu_image_url":"","fifu_image_alt":"","c2c-post-author-ip":"2.217.156.155","footnotes":""},"categories":[1,9007],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-52855","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-latest","category-maritime-security"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/maritimehub.co.uk\/?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/52855","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/maritimehub.co.uk\/?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/maritimehub.co.uk\/?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/maritimehub.co.uk\/?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/maritimehub.co.uk\/?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=52855"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/maritimehub.co.uk\/?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/52855\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":52857,"href":"https:\/\/maritimehub.co.uk\/?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/52855\/revisions\/52857"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/maritimehub.co.uk\/?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/52856"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/maritimehub.co.uk\/?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=52855"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/maritimehub.co.uk\/?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=52855"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/maritimehub.co.uk\/?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=52855"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}