Transport Malta’s MSIU has launched an investigation report on the primary engine failure of an oil/chemical tanker whereas underway in January 2019.
Based on the report, the lubrication oil filter of the primary engine had been improperly mounted, which ultimately led to extreme damages to the parts of the primary engine and a whole failure of the primary engine.
The Incident
On 08 January 2019, at 0742, whereas the vessel was navigating by way of Skagerrak, an oil mist detector alarm was noticed within the engine-room, adopted by a lubricating oil low strain alarm.
Assuming that these had been false alarms, the crew members reset the alarms. At 1100, because the climate circumstances worsened, the grasp determined to scale back the velocity of the primary engine. Following the discount in the primary engine’s rpm, the velocity of the vessel was noticed to be round 4.5 knots. The oil mist detector alarm sounded a few occasions extra within the afternoon, however the system was once more reset.
At 1634, whereas taking a routine spherical within the steering gear room, the second engineer observed an irregular change within the sound of the primary engine. On coming into the engine-room, he observed that the primary engine had stopped and there was important smoke within the space. He additionally observed sparks round among the crankcase covers. He checked the crankcase covers and observed that the temperatures of all of the covers had been regular. After concluding that the smoke was not the results of a fireplace, the chief engineer opened the engine room skylight with a purpose to vent out the smoke.
At 1645, the chief engineer knowledgeable the grasp that he was unable to restart the primary engine. Because the grasp observed that the vessel was drifting towards land, anchors had been dropped at 1706.
Having been towed to the restore facility in Rotterdam it was discovered that the lubrication oil filter of the primary engine had been improperly mounted. This resulted in insufficient lubrication of the primary engine, resulting in irreparable harm to the crankshaft.
Possible explanation for the oil mist alarm
The damages sustained by the primary engine’s working gear appear to point that these parts had been subjected to intensive friction. The cylinder pistons, liners and crank pin bearing journals of the crankshaft confirmed comparable indicators of friction.
The friction between the parts of the engine would have most likely resulted within the era of excessive temperatures throughout the crankcase areas of the engine as a consequence of microwelding, on account of restricted lubrication.
These excessive temperatures (sizzling spots), in flip, would have led to the vaporisation of oil, build up an oil mist, as already defined. This is able to have triggered the oil mist detector alarm.
Conclusions
The lubricating oil filter was reassembled incorrectly, proscribing the circulation of lubricating oil to the primary engine.
The restricted oil circulation compromised lubrication of the primary engine’s working gear, resulting in the overheating of those parts.
The oil mist detector alarm was triggered a variety of occasions, most likely as a consequence of era of oil mist attributable to the overheating of the engine’s parts.
These alarms had been erroneously assumed to be false and consequently, accepted by the crew members.
The unfavourable climate circumstances may have adversely affected the standard of remainder of the crew members, which in flip would have affected their skill to successfully monitor the state of affairs within the engine room.
The incidence resulted in extreme damages to the parts of the primary engine and a whole failure of the primary engine.
Did you subscribe to our every day Publication?
It’s Free Click on right here to Subscribe!
Supply: Transport Malta
